Pages to Show
- New York Home
- Click Here to Return to Main Site
- Reject Medical Aid in Dying Act
- ADA Will Trump Euthanasia Prohibition
- Newsletter: Focus on NY - East Coast
- Assisting Persons Can Have an Agenda
- Not Everyone Will Have the Support I Had
- I Am So Happy to Be Alive!
- “Even If the Patient Struggled, Who Would Know?”
- John Norton: A Cautionary Tale
- Deaths Will Be Certified as Natural
- Perpetrators Will Be Allowed to Inherit
- Dore Bio: Margaret Dore v David Leven
Wednesday, September 3, 2025
Trump to Award Mayor Giuliani the Medal of Freedom
Rep. Jerrold Nadler Will not be Running for Re-Election
Nadler, 78, has been considered one of the leading liberal voices in Congress, saying that he is responding to the call for generational change that has recently been dividing his party.
He recently told The New York Times of his plans, provided that they didn’t reveal them until Monday. He said that he hesitated to step aside at this time, while, in his view, President Donald Trump stands as a threat to the foundations of democracy, according to The Times. But he told them that he believes it is time for the changing of the guard.
“Watching the Biden thing really said something about the necessity for generational change in the party, and I think I want to respect that,” Nadler said, adding that a younger successor “can maybe do better, can maybe help us more.”
Saturday, August 16, 2025
Diane Coleman’s Last Review: Life After, “A Wonderful Film.”
https://notdeadyet.org/diane-colemans-last-review-life-after-a-wonderful-film/
Ian McIntosh, Executive Director Not Dead Yet:
To the best of my knowledge, one of the last tasks Founder, President and CEO of Not Dead Yet (NDY), Diane Coleman completed, days before her sudden passing last November, was to watch Reid Davenport’s Life After.
Diane intended to write a fulsome review. And although she could not publish her thoughts in time, she left one of sorts, complete in its brevity, in an email to the film’s creators, saying that Life After is: “a wonderful film”.
In this arena and in our community, there’s no higher praise. As Diane’s successor, serving as the Executive Director of NDY, and as a self-confessed cinephile, having seen the documentary several times now, I can confirm that like everything else Diane weighed in on: Of course, she’s right. Life After is a wonderful film for too many reasons to expand upon here and now.
But Multimedia Films, the production house for Life After, notes on its website a synopsis of the documentary, which in part reads:
Sunday, June 8, 2025
New York’s Dangerous Killing Act Must be Rejected
New York‘s "Medical Aid in Dying Act" is under consideration in the state’s Senate Health Committee after passing in the state Assembly in late April. It has 25 co-sponsors in the Senate, and 32 votes are needed to pass it. Democratic leaders have expressed confidence that it will do so, and even some Republican senators are open to voting for it. Gov. Kathy Hochul’s (D-NY) position is ambiguous, but MAID advocates expect her support once the bill clears the Senate.
New York voters also overwhelmingly support it. A recent YouGov survey found that 72% back the measure, including 65% of Catholics.
But the bill is a fast-rolling nightmare for the disabled, elderly, and the culture as a whole. Much support for physician-assisted suicide is well-intended. But crossing the bright red line from preserving life to intentionally hastening death has created moral catastrophes in countries that have made the move. New York should heed these examples.
Tuesday, May 6, 2025
What About Providing Aid in Living?
Proceeding down this path would be both a moral and practical failure, violating the sanctity of life and leading to a further erosion in the health and well-being of society’s most vulnerable.
Sunday, May 4, 2025
New York Talking Points, Including Commentary by Dawn Eskew & Margaret Dore
In attachments are the talking points I referred to you in our conversation this morning. I can not stress enough to urge everyone on our side to stay clear away from bringing up religion, moral theology, prolife, and things like that.
The problem is the proposed Bill is a Bad Policy Bill, and the reasons pointed out should be our mantra.
One can be for the concept, but not these bills. (2025 #A136 & #S138).
I will be dropping off to your office , as discussed, our brochure which contains all of the short bullet points.
Most Sincerely,
Dawn C . Eskew1.631.487.7578
Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Vote No! on S. 136: New York Should Not Be Considering Assisted Suicide When So Many People Struggle to Live.
By Lisa Blumberg (pictured right) and Not Dead Yet.
It is disturbing that at a time when the healthcare system is so broken and so many people struggle to get the care and practical support, they need that New York would want to try repeatedly pass legislation which would legalize doctor assisted suicide. The state has shown good judgment in rejecting the idea before and should reject it now.
The pandemic has made evident the deadly health care disparities that people of color, older people and persons with disabilities have always been subjected to. Any law which enables doctors to write lethal prescriptions at the request of people deemed to have six months or less to live, as this bill would, increases risk for devalued patients.
Despite common misconceptions, uncontrollable pain is not a primary reason that people turn to assisted suicide. Data indicates that people often request lethal prescriptions due to perceived lessening of autonomy, or feelings of being burden. As Cliff Perez, a disability rights activist, states, “these reasons are… existential or disability related and ought to be addressed with quality, multidisciplinary care, not death.” It is not so much how individuals view living with limitations caused by illness or disability, but society’s stigma and failure to provide practical supports to address such limitations.